Current:Home > Finance18 California children are suing the EPA over climate change -StockSource
18 California children are suing the EPA over climate change
View
Date:2025-04-18 15:42:51
Eighteen California children are suing the Environmental Protection Agency, claiming it violated their constitutional rights by failing to protect them from the effects of climate change. This is the latest in a series of climate-related cases filed on behalf of children.
The federal lawsuit is called Genesis B. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency. According to the lawsuit, the lead plaintiff "Genesis B." is a 17-year-old Long Beach, California resident whose parents can't afford air conditioning.
As the number of extreme heat days increases, the lawsuit says Genesis isn't able to stay cool in her home during the day. "On many days, Genesis must wait until the evening to do schoolwork when temperatures cool down enough for her to be able to focus," according to the lawsuit.
The other plaintiffs range in age from eight to 17 and also are identified by their first names and last initials because they are minors. For each plaintiff, the lawsuit mentions ways that climate change is affecting their lives now, such as wildfires and flooding that have damaged landscapes near them and forced them to evacuate their homes or cancel activities.
"Time is slipping away, and the impact of the climate crisis is already hitting us directly. We are running from wildfires, being displaced by floods, panicking in hot classrooms during another heat wave," 15-year-old plaintiff Noah said in a statement provided by the non-profit, public interest law firm Our Children's Trust, which filed the suit.
The lawsuit comes on the heels of a legal victory in another suit that Our Children's Trust filed on behalf of children. This summer, a state judge in Montana handed Our Children's Trust an historic win. The judge found the state violated 16 young plaintiffs' "right to a clean and healthful environment." That case is being appealed.
The California federal case claims the EPA violated the children's constitutional rights by allowing carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels to warm the climate. It notes the agency's 2009 finding that carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, is a public health threat, and children are the most vulnerable.
"There is one federal agency explicitly tasked with keeping the air clean and controlling pollution to protect the health of every child and the welfare of a nation—the EPA," said Julia Olson, chief legal counsel for Our Children's Trust in the statement. "The agency has done the opposite when it comes to climate pollution, and it's time the EPA is held accountable by our courts for violating the U.S. Constitution."
An EPA spokesperson said because of the pending litigation, the agency could not comment on the lawsuit.
The lawsuit does not specifically seek financial compensation, other than plaintiff costs and attorneys' fees. It asks instead for various declarations about the environmental rights of children and the EPA's responsibility to protect them.
Our Children's Trust filed a different federal lawsuit in 2015, Juliana v. United States, against the entire government. It was dismissed in 2020 and revived by an Oregon judge this summer. The group also has legal actions pending in Florida, Hawaii, Utah and Virginia.
veryGood! (5323)
Related
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Adding Batteries to Existing Rooftop Solar Could Qualify for 30 Percent Tax Credit
- House Republicans request interviews with Justice Department officials in Hunter Biden probe
- WHO questions safety of aspartame. Here's a list of popular foods, beverages with the sweetener.
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Tim McGraw and Faith Hill’s Daughter Gracie Shares Update After Taking Ozempic for PCOS
- A Kentucky Power Plant’s Demise Signals a Reckoning for Coal
- Princess Eugenie Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 2 With Husband Jack Brooksbank
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Court Sides With Trump on Keystone XL Permit, but Don’t Expect Fast Progress
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Summer House Cast Drops a Shocker About Danielle Olivera's Ex Robert Sieber
- Jennifer Hudson Celebrates Son David's Middle School Graduation
- Fearing Oil Spills, Tribe Sues to Get a Major Pipeline Removed from Its Land
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Wheeler Announces a New ‘Transparency’ Rule That His Critics Say Is Dangerous to Public Health
- Wage theft often goes unpunished despite state systems meant to combat it
- Carbon capture technology: The future of clean energy or a costly and misguided distraction?
Recommendation
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
12 Things From Goop's $29,677+ Father's Day Gift Ideas We'd Actually Buy
Princess Eugenie Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 2 With Husband Jack Brooksbank
The US Rejoins the Paris Agreement, but Rebuilding Credibility on Climate Action Will Take Time
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
USPS is hiking the price of a stamp to 66 cents in July — a 32% increase since 2019
To See Offshore Wind Energy’s Future, Look on Shore – in Massachusetts
Florida police say they broke up drug ring selling fentanyl and xylazine